|
|||||
![]() |
THE CONFERENCE CALL |
||||
|
NCBP
Names New Secretary, Council Members |
|||||
|
The annual meeting of the National Conference of Bar
Presidents traditionally concludes with a business meeting and, in similar
tradition, the last item on the agenda is the report of the nominating
committee, recommending officers for the coming year as well as five new
members of the executive council. This year's annual meeting in Atlanta
was no exception and David S. Houghton, immediate past president of NCBP
and chair of the NCBP nominating committee, announced the committee's
recommendations. Following the report of the nominating committee, the
membership elected by acclamation the new secretary and five new members
of the council and installed officers of the NCBP for the 2004-05 year. Douglas S. Lang of Dallas, Texas, was installed as president of NCBP. He is a past president of the Dallas Bar Association and served on the executive council from 1995 to 1998. He is also a past president of the Metropolitan Bar Caucus. Mr. Lang serves as a Justice on the Texas Court of Appeals, Fifth District. Lonnie J. Williams Jr. of Phoenix, Arizona, was named president-elect of NCBP and will succeed to the office of president in 2005. Mr. Williams is a past president of the Maricopa County Bar Association and a partner in the Phoenix office of Quarles & Brady Streich Lang LLP, where his practice focuses on civil litigation with an emphasis on employment related matters, tort, banking, and real estate disputes. Steven R. Sorenson of Ripon, Wisconsin, assumed the office of treasurer. Mr. Sorenson will succeed to the office of president-elect next year and ultimately will serve as NCBP President in 2006. He is a former president of the State Bar of Wisconsin, has held several other elective offices and served on the bar’s board of governors for several years. He is currently a member of the ABA House of Delegates and a fellow of the American Bar Foundation. Mr. Sorenson is in private practice in Ripon with the Sorenson Law Office. |
Kay
H. Hodge of Boston, Massachusetts, joined the
|
||||
|
President’s Message |
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF 2006 C. Joseph Holland, Iowa City, IA Monty A. McIntyre, San Diego, CA James P. Nolan, Annapolis, MD Howard A. Shalowitz, St. Louis, MO
Gloria J. Sturman, Las Vegas, NV
2007
Ex Officio
Carl D. Smallwood, Columbus, OH |
||
|
Thank you for the
opportunity to serve you, the members of the
|
|||
|
NCBF Update |
|||
|
This is an era in which it is easy to be overwhelmed by the
paper deluge of memoranda, pamphlets, journals and mountains of e-mails as
well. We also face an array of organizations seeking our membership and
loyalty. In the legal field alone, we have the ABA, state and local bars,
regional bars, boutique bars, international bars, and numerous networking
organizations. So it is appropriate to ask why should you pay any attention to the bar foundation in your venue. In the January-February 2004 issue of Bar Leader, Michele Sherpun puts forth the case for the foundation very well: "Raise the visibility of the profession and reinforce the rule of law; create new ways for the legal community to be involved in changing lives for the better; draw attention to the unique legal needs for the country and all the underserved; allow others inside and outside of the legal profession to rally around and invest in the foundation's efforts; and provide access for justice." I believe that bar foundations, with few exceptions, would endorse that mission. But the inevitable challenge is how do we carry it out, particularly how do we improve access to justice and be involved in "changing lives for the better."
My proactive suggestions are: First, foundation board
members should be those who have been and want to be actively involved in
pro bono policy and projects, are willing to be trained and are ready to
accept responsibility. |
Second, I suggest that foundation missions and
projects be primarily attuned to the needs of the community, including
those that improve the quality of life for the needy and further access to
justice. Eschew pet projects of bar association officers unless they meet
that criteria. |
||
|
NABE NABE Update |
|||
|
When you think about it, the essence of
a bar association - or any professional organization - is to find out what
our members want (or, more importantly, what they need) and give it to
them in the most convenient, cost-effective manner. All those high-falutin'
marketing and management concepts come down to "give 'em what they want." |
Money is a huge issue for smaller bars.
Strategies that allow them to participate without spending money are
necessary if they are to remain members. In response to Jan's findings, the NABE
Board recently approved a report to "tweak" programming at our meetings.
Programming at the midyear meeting will be "nuts and bolts," with even
more opportunities for people to talk about issues based on the size of
their bar or their job responsibility within the bar. The annual meeting
will feature big-name, cutting-edge speakers, and become the showcase
event for NABE. The goal is to target our programming to better meet our
members' needs, and differentiate between the two meetings so those who
can only attend one, have an understanding of each meeting's focus. |
||
![]() 2004 NCBP ANNUAL MEETING HIGHLIGHTS The National Conference of Bar Presidents and Metropolitan Bar Caucus held their annual meetings August 5-7 IN Atlanta. Several of the topics discussed are summarized in this edition of The Conference Call. |
|||||||||
|
Workshop -
Encouraging Lawyers to Serve in the Legislature |
|||||||||
|
This workshop focused on
the declining number of lawyers in state legislatures across the country
and the impact the decline is having on our laws. NCBP Executive Council
member James P. Nolan introduced the discussion by pointing out that the
percentage of lawyers in the legislature range from a low of 3% in New
Hampshire and 4% in North Dakota to a high of only 32% in Massachusetts
and Texas. He then introduced the panelists.
The Missouri Bar President William M. Corrigan began by telling of the
significant role of lawyers in the proud history of our country's
founding. |
![]() Workshop panelists from left to right: Leah G. Johnson, Harry S. Johnson, Cathy Cox and William Corrigan Jr. |
||||||||
| Of
the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 25 were lawyers; and of
the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention, 31 were lawyers. Using
a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Corrigan noted the nationwide decline in
the number of lawyers who serve in state legislatures. Eighteen states
have legislatures that are fewer than 13% lawyers. The most common reasons
for the decline in Missouri include a $31,300 annual salary, spending
Monday through Thursday away from the office and home for 4-1/2 months,
and raising at least $300,000 for any chance at winning a state Senate
campaign. Mr. Corrigan’s presentation focused upon three areas: (1) educating the bar and the public on how few lawyers there are in the legislature, (2) reasons why it is important for lawyers to serve in the legislature, and (3) identifying and encouraging lawyers to run for legislative office. Mr. Corrigan explained that ways to educate the bar and the public about this problem include meeting with local and specialty bars, meeting with large and small law firms, holding a law school symposium, holding programs at annual meetings, working with the media and recognizing lawyer-legislators in bar publications. To date, there are 5 lawyers in the Missouri Senate and 21 lawyers in the state’s House of Representatives. Corrigan noted the most recent statistics of 10 lawyers running for Senate seats and 41 lawyers running for House of Representative seats in the August 3, 2004 Missouri primary election. Of the lawyers who ran, 75% won. Mr. Corrigan reiterated the importance of lawyers in the legislature by stating that "although there may be lawyer bashing in the legislature, when push comes to shove, they respect lawyers and rely on them for guidance." Maryland State Bar Association Immediate Past President Harry S. Johnson explained the role of the bar in promoting an independent judiciary. Judges do not face a friendly climate when they go before the Maryland legislature for a salary increase. It is believed that jurists receive a chilly |
reception because they run in contested elections every 15 years and earn
an annual salary of $119,000; whereas legislators run every 4 years and
earn significantly less than their judicial counterparts. Mr. Johnson also noted that the Maryland Bar Bulletin highlights lawyer legislators with an insert, profile, and photo. His final point was that local and specialty bar association presidents have more impact with legislators than state bar association presidents because the legislator's constituents live in the district where the local bar and specialty bar associations are situated. During the question and answer session, Mr. Nolan encouraged inviting legislators to local programs. Mr. Corrigan said that, although political parties have not yet been approached with the idea of encouraging more lawyers to run for legislative office, they should be. Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association President Jay DeHart spoke about the Missouri Non-partisan Plan and efforts by the Missouri legislature to modify the Plan. The exceptional moderator and panel of speakers provided an excellent overview of the need for more lawyers in the legislature and gave suggestions on how to achieve increased numbers. This was one of those rare sessions where attendees could walk away with the tools to solve a problem.
|
||||||||
|
Plenary - The
Multijurisdictional Practice Rule |
|||||||||
|
Multijurisdictional practice continues to be a
front-burner topic for state bar associations and the courts. At the NCBP
Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Mike Rubin, member of the NCBP Executive
Council, moderated a panel that provided an update of where MJP is and
where it may be heading. The panel included Wayne J. Positan, first vice president of the New Jersey State Bar Association and former chair of the ABA Commission on MJP; Gloria Sturman, immediate past president of the State Bar of Nevada and member of the NCBP Executive Council; and David K. Y. Tang of Seattle, managing partner of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP, who chaired a group of ABA Section Chairs formed to review and comment upon the Model Rules as they were developed. Each of the panelists has had involvement in the MJP debate, either at their state level or at the ABA level. Mike Rubin opened the discussion by noting that MJP affects all lawyers from every practice area and that the panel reflects the perspectives of differing practice areas. Wayne Positan gave an overview of action by the states since the ABA House of Delegates approved Model Rule 5.5 on MJP. Virtually every state has studied or is studying the issue. Twenty-eight jurisdictions have taken some action. Eleven have adopted Rule 5.5, although with some variation from state to state. The states are acting and the concept of national licensing appears to be a dead end at this point. Mr. Positan emphasized that Rule 5.5 is a template and variation in some places was expected. Various parts of the Rule generate changes around the country. For example, in New Jersey the language relating to "temporary" practice was a concern. New Jersey substituted "occasional" for temporary in the text of its version of 5.5.
Registration of corporate counsel, making those temporary or occasional
appearances, is a matter of some controversy. Registration is not only a
way to monitor ethics compliance, but also a means to both raise revenue
through registration fees and to track reporting of income by corporate
counsel. |
relationships across borders. Mr.
Positan agreed that the Rule facilitates the lawyer following the client
across state lines. Gloria Sturman framed the issues as one of states’ rights. Nevada acted quickly, before Rule 5.5 was approved, to handle the matter at the state level, but in a fashion not all that different from the ABA Model Rule. She acknowledged the criticism of Rule 5.5 as protecting the monopoly of local lawyers, but that is why it is a states’ rights issue. The law does indeed vary from state to state and the nuances of local law create a need for local counsel, even under 5.5. Mr. Tang countered that Model Rule 1.1 requires competent representation and that alone implies an adequate knowledge of local law when practicing in another jurisdiction. In fact, an out-of-state lawyer may be more educated in the local law than a local lawyer who practices in another substantive area. Mr. Rubin asked why registration would be a concern for corporate counsel. "Minimum contacts" for disciplinary purposes may not equal the ability to find an out of state lawyer - which registration provides. Don't states have a legitimate interest in registration of out of state counsel? Mr. Positan explained that having to register in too many jurisdictions could be burdensome for corporate counsel, e.g. corporate counsel might have to visit fifteen states for the employer. There should also be a distinction as to whether litigation is involved or whether it is a transaction where members of the public in the state have a limited interest in the representation by out of state counsel. After all, client protection is the umbrella goal of the MJP rules. David Tang echoed these concerns, saying that a meeting or convention could require registration based upon physical presence in the state. There needs to be some sense of balance in applying pro hac vice and MJP rules. A member of the audience asked why firms at state borders should be allowed to take over business across the border without meeting stringent admission requirements; and, who will enforce discipline out of state. Mr. Positan responded that the Rule requires "full faith and credit" on disciplinary action. David Tang pointed out that regular invasion violates the "temporary" language in Model Rule 5.5 and licensure would be required. Mr. Rubin commented upon
the effect of the Internet and late night TV advertising, both of which
cross borders. Mr. Positan responded that distribution of information is
not giving advice and is not practicing law, but depending upon the nature
of the advertising it might require licensing. Mr. Tang noted that the
Birbrower case, which got the MJP de- bate going in earnest, was one which
held that a lawyer not licensed in the jurisdiction could not recover fees
and that Internet "practice" might be self-policing if clients simply
didn't pay. |
Mr. Rubin asked the panel what should be the
role of bar leaders in the MJP issue. Gloria Sturman related the Nevada experience where the bar was active in going on the road to find out from local lawyers, bar leaders, and court officials what the problems were with out of state lawyers, so appropriate rules could be crafted. The concern is giving advice to Nevada clients, not meeting in Nevada with out of state clients. This allowed the State Bar of Nevada to help craft regulations, even in advance of ABA recommendations. Mr. Tang pointed to the compact between Oregon, Idaho, and Washington as something that bar leaders need to look to as a means of dealing with the realities of MJP. Mr. Positan said that Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico; and Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine, are all considering compacts or reciprocity arrangements. Similarly, Washington and British Columbia and New York and Ontario are having similar regional discussions. Such arrangements may be the wave of the future. Members of the audience expressed concerns about the online or storefront operations providing forms and assistance. An audience member inquired about federal regulation of law practice. Mr. Positan was firm that regulation by the judiciary, not Congress, is the appropriate mechanism. Mr. Rubin closed the program by acknowledging the question on everyone's mind, "has there ever been a song written about MJP?" The answer is "of course" and he pulled the cover off a keyboard at the side of the platform and accompanied himself while singing that song, which contained the purported view of states that are for and against the proposed Model Rule. The song opened with: Tale as old as time/True as it can be/Client comes to ask/For a little task/Lawyer takes a fee/The new matter is great/It's in another state/The question comes to be/What the other state will see/About the state of MJP.
|
|||||||
|
Workshop - Taking Care of
Members: Lawyer Assistance Programs |
|||||||||
|
NCBP Executive Council Member and past Oklahoma Bar
Association President Joe Crosthwait moderated a panel that explored
timely lawyer assistance program issues, including funding, scope, and the
relation with risk management. Ann Foster, executive director of the Texas
Lawyers Assistance Program, and Stephenson Todd, chair of the Tennessee
Lawyers Assistance Program, examined how programs have obtained funding,
often after educating the respective governing body of the need and
benefits of such programs. While "LAP" programs typically start with chemical and alcohol addictions, Foster observed that many have broadened to mental health issues, and from solo and small firms to lawyers in larger firms. Some now participate in law schools. Todd emphasized the need for stable funding to run a viable program and noted how modest the original $10 per lawyer assessment in his state had been, compared to Back to Top |
the benefits, including fewer discipline matters and fewer claims against bar client security funds. Margaret Hepper, a lawyer working in legal malpractice insurance risk management, explained that attorney impairment is a common component in many malpractice cases and is difficult to underwrite. She also discussed the difficulty of reaching mid- and large-size firms on such issues. She suggested insurers could encourage firms to bring in a LAP representative annually to educate the firm's lawyers, to establish reporting structures, and to have a discreet person lawyers know they could call on. |
The panel noted that dependency is more readily recognized
as a condition to be treated, while depression often is not, perhaps
stemming from the idea that depressed lawyers should pick themselves up by
their own bootstraps. All agreed that information is crucial, so that people can recognize depression in others and themselves and obtain necessary referrals for appropriate mental health care. For more information, visit the ABA's Commission on Lawyer Assistance Web site: www.abanet.org and go to the "Commissions" section. You can also go directly to www.abanet.org/legalservices/colap
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Workshop - Mentoring Programs: A Road
to Professionalism |
|||||||||
|
Professionalism was one of the principal
programming themes at the annual meeting in Atlanta and this workshop
focused on newly admitted attorneys and the attempt by the organized bar
to instill professionalism early in a lawyer's career. Robert B. Young,
president of the Delaware State Bar Association, described several
programs required of newly admitted attorneys in that state. Each new lawyer is required to participate in a five-month long preceptorship, supervised by an experienced attorney willing to conduct the necessary orientation. The program focuses on the "cultural" aspects of practice, the traditions of the bar, and appropriate courtroom conduct. Newly admitted Delaware attorneys are also required to participate in a clerkship which can begin during law school and must be completed within one year of bar passage. Failure to complete the program requires that a lawyer retake the bar exam. This clerkship is conducted by the attorney's preceptor. In addition, a day-long pre-admission conference is required of newly admitted attorneys to provide familiarity with the court system. Finally, within four years of admission, beginning attorneys are required to complete 30 half-day Back to Top |
programs covering subjects such as trials,
arbitrations, motions, hearings, etc. Delaware obviously has the
most stringent of requirements for admission to practice. Ronald R. Ward, Seattle, Washington, and president-elect of the Washington State Bar Association, described his association's recommendations to the Washington Supreme Court, which are based on the belief that the profession must certify to the public that lawyers are capable and competent to handle client matters. Prior to admission, new lawyers would be required to attend a four-hour basic practical skills course focusing on practice techniques. In the 12 months following admission, 15 hours of skills training would be required followed by 15 more in the second 12 months and then 45 additional hours in the next four years. The final phase of this recommended program involves mentored client representation through a 100-hour practicum during the first year of practice. R. George Burnett, immediate past president
of the State Bar of Wisconsin, concluded the program with a description of
Wisconsin's voluntary introductory program for young lawyers. Each newly
admitted attorney in Wisconsin is offered a seminar on practice
techniques, covering 12 topics in a day-long format. The program was
designed by the bar to be affordable and involved assembling a quality
faculty for each of three centrally located venues. |
The attendees generally had five or fewer
years of experience in practice and attendance exceeded 500 lawyers in
each location. The evaluations of the program by those in attendance was
extremely positive. These three presentations covered the entire spectrum of possible introductory programs on professionalism for newly admitted attorneys, from Delaware's mandatory program to Wisconsin's voluntary approach.
|
|||||||
|
Workshop - Five Quick
Hitters on Metro Bar Diversity Programs |
|||||||||
|
Reprising its popular "Quick Hitter" format,
the Metropolitan Bar Caucus (MBC) workshop featured five successful
metropolitan bar diversity programs, four from Atlanta and one from
Columbus, Ohio. The Friday morning session was fast-paced and stimulating,
as each speaker was only permitted seven minutes to make his or her case
and was subject to being "gonged" by moderator MBC President Seth
Kirschenbaum. The first program highlighted was the Atlanta Bar Association's Truancy Intervention Project (TIP). Terry Walsh, a former Atlanta Bar Association president and TIP's founder, talked about the program which provides lawyer volunteers who become involved in the lives of school truants referred by the juvenile court and local schools. TIP has an impressive 80% success rate in changing the lives of the children fortunate enough to benefit from the program. Following Mr. Walsh, Natasha Perdew
Silas, an attorney with the federal defender program of the Northern |
District of Georgia, talked about the Atlanta Bar's High School Internship Program which places several dozen students from minority high schools with Atlanta law firms for six weeks each summer. The principal from Therrell High School appeared at the session to extol the program to the audience. The Atlanta Bar's Minority Clerkship Program, which places minority law students with Atlanta law firms for summer clerkships, was discussed by Judge Carl W. McCalla III. Carl Smallwood, the newly installed president of the MBC, spoke about the Columbus Bar Association's highly lauded Managing Partner's Diversity Initiative, a program which has |
significantly increased the
selection and retention of minority associates at major Columbus law firms. Finally, William
deGolian, another former Atlanta Bar Association president, talked about
the Atlanta Bar's LRIS Modest Means Fee Panel, an initiative designed to
provide legal services at an affordable price to lower income people who
are not eligible for legal aid but who cannot afford full price for
lawyers.
|
|||||||
|
NCBP Offers Diversity
Fellowships for Midyear and Annual Meetings |
|||||||||
|
In support of its commitment to
diversity, the NCBP will provide registration fee waivers to the president
or president-elect of minority bar associations for attendance at the
upcoming midyear meeting in Salt Lake City and the annual meeting in
Chicago. Travel and lodging expenses are not covered by the fellowships.
While the fee waivers are available to leaders from minority bars
nationwide, bar leaders in the Salt Lake City and Chicago areas are
particularly encouraged to apply since they will not have to incur travel
and lodging expenses to attend the meetings. For several meetings, the Minnesota State Bar Association has covered the travel expenses for leaders of Minnesota minority bars in cooperation with NCBP’s fellowship program. The Rhode Island Bar Association has also helped to sponsor attendance by a leader from a bar for lawyers of color. Other state and metropolitan bars are encouraged to consider this idea. If you are interested or know of a bar leader who may be interested in a fellowship to attend an upcoming NCBP meeting, please contact Beverley Ware via e-mail: bware@staff.abanet.org Back to Top |
|||||||||
|
Workshop - Should the Bar be the
Professionalism Police? |
|||||||||
|
This workshop, another in the professionalism
concentration at the Atlanta meeting, explored the role of the organized
bar in overseeing professionalism in the legal community. Thomas Zlaket of
Tucson, Arizona, former chief justice of the Arizona Supreme Court,
described Arizona's required professionalism course for new lawyers, which
has now been expanded to cover all practicing attorneys in Arizona. Initially a day long, the Arizona program, has now been shortened to a one-half day format. In addition, Arizona has created a new professionalism task force to re-evaluate all professionalism efforts, beginning with defining the term "professionalism." Arizona has mandatory continuing legal education with an ethics and professionalism requirement. Justice Zlaket described professionalism as alive and well in Arizona. Melvin F. Wright Jr., of Raleigh, North Carolina, executive director of the chief justice's Committee on Professionalism, reported that his task force examined mandatory professionalism educational programs and recommended Back to Top |
against establishing such a program in North Carolina. The committee decided that law schools and
the bar association continuing legal education efforts provided sufficient
professionalism programming. Richard A. Badolato of Roseland, New Jersey,
chair of the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism and the Law,
reported on the efforts of his commission. |
of professionalism. According to the jurist,
bar associations do not have the resources to act as professionalism
police and lawyers have to enforce the professionalism rules. He reported
on Arizona's peer review mentoring program and the fact that it is largely
ineffective. Justice Zlaket also said the courts have to care about the
profession and the public perception of its members if any professionalism
principles are to be uniformly enforced.
|
|||||||
|
NCBP Seeks Recommendations for
Outstanding Speakers Those who have attended NCBP meetings have heard some entertaining and inspirational speakers. Bar leaders need such speakers for membership meetings, law day events and other functions. With your help, NCBP hopes to compile a list of outstanding speakers, with contact information. We are asking for you to forward names and other relavant information, including how to contact the individual, topics on which you have heard them speak, etc. We are purposely not speaking to compile a "distinguished" speaker list, as that can mean a dull delivery and soporific effect. We want to hear from you about outstanding speakers you have enjoyed. Some of the names already mentioned include Justice Rosalie Abella from Canada, civil rights lawyer Morris Dees and William Barker, who portrays Thomas Jefferson, in period dress and time. Please e-mail the suggested speaker and his or her best workshop topics, along with the address, phone and fax numbers and e-mail address to the attention of Kimberly Vann at vann2@staff.abanet.org This list will be available at www.ncbp.org |
|||||||||
|
Metropolitan Bar Caucus Beer and Bull
Plenary Session |
|||||||||
|
The Metropolitan Bar Caucus, once again used
the popular Beer and Bull format for its afternoon plenary in Atlanta.
Consistently rated by past attendees as the most fun, most stimulating and
most rewarding program of the entire week, the Beer and Bull session
divides the participants into round tables of eight to ten people who
spend the afternoon talking with each other about issues of concern to
metropolitan and other bar associations. At each table, in keeping with the theme of this conference, the initial discussions focused on diversity issues. Subsequently, participants were encouraged to open up the discussion to cover other topics. The opportunity to interact with Back to Top |
other bar officers and executives from around the country was uniformly said to be the most rewarding experience of the conference in Atlanta. Five tables of participants eagerly spoke and listened, and even after two hours, there were still people excitedly sharing ideas. |
Not only does this format
serve to foment the exchange of ideas, but it also serves to energize and
inspire participants. Finally, it gives folks a chance to meet new friends
and establish relationships in a way that traditional talking head panels
do not. |
|||||||
|
Workshop - Encouraging Leadership, Participation by Lawyers of Color by Monty A. McIntyre, Chair, NCBP Communications Committee |
|||||||||
| This
session featured different programs by the Minnesota State Bar
Association, the New York State Bar Association and the State Bar of New
Mexico that are designed to encourage leadership and participation by
lawyers of color. A Web Approach: www.MnLegalDiversity.org Jorge Saavedra and Kari Jensen Thomas discussed the Minnesota State Bar Association (MSBA Web site, www.MnLegalDiversity.org. The site, launched on April 1, 2004 (no fooling), is intended to be a useful tool that will encourage and attract lawyers of color to practice law in Minnesota. Diversity has been a significant topic of discussion in Minnesota. Firms and businesses consider this Web site a new way to promote diversity within the state, using testimonials and profiles to attract persons of color. The site showcases a vibrant Minnesota community of diverse practitioners and law students across a spectrum of practice areas. It focuses on cultural communities, giving information that is not generally available from other sources. The site also provides information about communities, organizations, activities, entertainment, weather, and housing. While the Web site was created with Flash (a brand of web design software) and uploaded for only $5,000, the Minnesota bar was able to generate $31,000 in donations from several law firms, with Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank also contributing. Law firms or businesses that contributed $2,500 have their firm or business listed on the site, as well as a link to their own Web site. This idea generated much enthusiasm. As an example, upon learning of the project, leaders at the Robbins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi firm called and offered to contribute to the site. They later hosted the Web launch party. New York's Diversity Initiatives Kenneth G. Standard, the second black president of the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA), discussed several of the bar's diversity programs. Mr. Standard noted that the NYSBA has never had any exclusionary policies, unlike the ABA, but observed that the ABA's focus on diversity has enabled that organization to make more progress in this area than the NYSBA has to date. However, the bar is now actively promoting Back to Top |
diversity as shown by the following current diversity programs discussed
by Mr. Standard: Reception for Lawyers of Color: This reception, held last
January, had over 300 attendees, and many NYSBA sections participated. Committee on Diversity and Leadership: A new committee of the NYSBA, it has a dual role, to improve diversity, and develop future leaders for the bar. Leadership Commitment to the Diversity Agenda: For several years, NYSBA leadership has committed to diversity, to overcome the limitations of one-year initiatives which often stop after the end of the leader's term. Membership Support for Increased Diversity: Twelve seats have been added to the New York Conference of Delegates, to be filled based upon considerations of ethnic and geographic diversity. Two seats have been added to the executive committee to be held by people of color. The Conference on Commonality in New Mexico The Conference on Commonality was a program started by Mary Torres, past president of the State Bar of New Mexico and a member of the NCBP Executive Council. Ms. Torres was the second Hispanic president, and the first female Hispanic to serve as president of the bar. The Conference on Commonality was designed to bring together all of the legal organizations in New Mexico, in one room, to brainstorm issues and work on common solutions. Three members from each group were invited. One member of the New Mexico State Supreme Court also attended. This program is inexpensive, can be easily replicated by other bars, and was so successful that the conference continues to be held annually in New Mexico. During the discussion, the participants realized they were interested in the same 5 core issues, referred to as "5 common threads": leadership training and development, solo and small firm practice, CLE, the mentoring of young lawyers and law students and judicial representation. Leadership Training and Development: The New Mexico Bar has a 4-month leadership program called the Leadership Training Institute (LTI). The assembled groups were given information about this program and were invited to send current and future leaders to the program for training. LTI applications doubled thereafter. Solo and Small Firm Practice: One suggestion was to identify minority |
owned solo firms and businesses and address the issues they face.
CLE: The groups all expressed theneed for more
relevant CLE programs. In response to this need, the SBNM decided to
partner with Hispanic and African-American bar groups to provide CLE.
|
|||||||
|
Plenary - Professionalism: Taking Stock After 20
Years by Steven R. Sorenson, NCBP Treasurer |
|||||||||
| NCBP
Executive Council Member Joe Condo opened the Saturday morning plenary
session by stating, "the need to discuss professionalism is essential; the
threat has never been higher." The Honorable Robert Bell, Chief Judge of
the Maryland Court of Appeals, explained Maryland's attempt to deal with
the issue. He noted that the first step is to define professionalism and
personally defined it as putting the interest of others above those of the
lawyer. "As protectors of the rule of law, lawyers are essential to society. The duty of the lawyer is to teach a client the value of transcending the personal interest to the interest of society," Judge Bell said. He spoke of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson who was serious about his responsibility to be courteous. According to Bell, Justice Jackson believed that, "Law was like a religious practice. It was more than an occupation. It demanded conscious independence and integrity above all else." Bell surmised this is why judges like Jackson are respected in spite of disagreements with their decisions or analyses. He further said that professionalism is a bench and bar issue that cannot be separated, then announced that the Conference of Judges has passed a resolution encouraging the study of professionalism. Judge Bell said that Maryland has adopted a mandatory law school class on professionalism as a response to the evolution of law from a profession to a business. Many of the young lawyers appeared to have grasped the importance of professionalism better than some of the older attorneys. Maryland created a commission in each of its districts to address that problem. Each district held a town hall meeting that began by asking how one defines professionalism. The commission also noted a decline in the number of lawyers participating in organized bar activities. Judge Bell said that this lack of interaction has resulted in a lack of civility among lawyers. Judges were not exempt from the Back to Top |
commission's scrutiny. Not being on time, ignoring the concerns of
attorneys, and arrogance were all cited as issues judges needed to
address.
In her remarks, Beryl Crowley, executive director of Texas Center of Professionalism, suggested legal education does not teach students to be lawyers; it provides academic information. The process of being a lawyer is an ongoing life pursuit. Thus, there is a need for continuing ethical education. Ms. Crowley explained that the center is totally independent of the State Bar of Texas and has developed a mandatory on-line course for new lawyers on ethics and professionalism. She highlighted several other courses which have been developed as well as the training offered by the center. Ms. Crowley also informed the group of the center's role as a referral center for disciplinary committees. Additionally, the center awards entities that demonstrate excellence in professionalism. Following Ms. Crowley, Patrick Longan, a
law professor at Mercer University's George School of Law, told the
assembly about the course in professionalism that is now a required course
in the first year. It is not an ethics course, it is a professionalism
course that begins with defining professionalism in the context of being a
lawyer and deals with life skills as well as the importance of lawyers in
the community. The elements of the course show the student how
professionalism encompasses craftsmanship, transcends income, incorporates
civility, respects compliance, and recognizes competence. Thomas Zlaket, a longtime advocate for professionalism, followed Longan and explained the issues he dealt with as chief justice of the Arizona Supreme Court. According to Justice Zlaket, "We keep wrestling with this issue and since this issue is |
essential for our profession, it must be on the front burner." As far as
educational efforts are concerned, he noted that Arizona has had a
professionalism course requirement for a long time. He also said that the
students taking the course claim that it doesn't make sense to make it
mandatory for students; they have never done anything wrong. It is the
existing lawyers who have caused problems. Arizona now has a mandatory
program for all lawyers. "Are things any better after all these years of discussion?" Justice Zlaket queried the audience. Answering his own question, he observed, "Not really but they are probably not worse. But we cannot stop talking about it and looking for ways to solve the problem." The movie "Liar, Liar" is the key to putting the issue in perspective, according to Justice Zlaket. This is the way the public sees lawyers as it relates to telling the truth. Justice Zlaket cited the Professional Reform Initiative (PRI), sponsored by the NCBP, as a successful vehicle to advance professionalism. "PRI picked the initial issue of truth and honesty. The issue should be easy but to lawyers it is not," he said and continued, "Truth still has a fluid meaning to many practitioners. PRI has tried to go beyond the surface issues of civility to the deeper meanings, but the work is never ending." Following the presentations, attendees assembled for roundtable discussions on the topic. Joe Condo ended the session by challenging everyone to take up the issue and work toward a solution.
|
|||||||
| Photos from the NCBP 2004 Annual Meeting | |||||||||
![]() Harvard Law Professor and Author Charles Ogletree Jr. delivers the keynote address on diversity at the Friday plenary session. |
NCBP Secretary Steve
Sorenson is joined by Rebecca Torres Gibson and NCBP Executive Council
Member Mary Torres at the Friday joint reception. |
NCBP President Doug Lang accepts the gavel
from his immediate predecessor, Paul Moxley at the conclusion of the
annual meeting on Saturday morning. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
For Back Issues See
|
Home | History |
Officers & Members | Meetings
| Programs | Resources
| Committees | |